EPA proposes that greenhouse gasses pose "public health threat"

See their announcement on their website here.

"EPA’s proposed endangerment finding is based on rigorous, peer-reviewed scientific analysis of six gases – carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride – that have been the subject of intensive analysis by scientists around the world. The science clearly shows that concentrations of these gases are at unprecedented levels as a result of human emissions, and these high levels are very likely the cause of the increase in average temperatures and other changes in our climate.

[snip]

The proposed endangerment finding now enters the public comment period, which is the next step in the deliberative process EPA must undertake before issuing final findings. Today’s proposed finding does not include any proposed regulations. Before taking any steps to reduce greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, EPA would conduct an appropriate process and consider stakeholder input. Notwithstanding this required regulatory process, both President Obama and Administrator Jackson have repeatedly indicated their preference for comprehensive legislation to address this issue and create the framework for a clean energy economy."

Now you may say, um, "duh", but this is a key step in getting legislative action at the federal level.

Of course, as this ABC News piece outlines, the move has its proponents and its detractors. The detractors are suitably extreme in their opposition, saying this move will single-handedly destroy our economy. 

So I guess we've got the destruction on both sides, then...our planet or our economy.

Isn't it possible that we can make adjustments along the way that will prevent both? I know the bush Administration was all about "staying the course". Isn't our hope that an Obama Administration will be more nimble, less prideful?

It's mine anyway.

Hat tip: Treehugger